(Psychological Literacy)
Self-Awareness
Lecture 4: LISTENING TO THE BODY, TEMPERAMENT,
AND OTHER SOURCES OF SELF-AWARENESS
Adam Blatner, M.D.
(This is the fourth lecture of this 6-lecture module on self-awareness
that is part of a
longer series on Psychological Literacy, offered to the Senior University
Georgetown
lifelong learning program, for its Fall 2009 program.
Eventually, more of the series will be posted on this website. This
fourth lecture will be given on October 19, 2009 (re-posted October 12, 2009)
This series of lectures will
include: 1. An orientation to the process of
self-awareness. 2. Motivations and
Ideals 3. Wiser and
More Foolish Coping Maneuvers
4. (This Lecture): Body Cues and Other Subtle Perceptions 5.
Social Connectedness and
Preferences 6.
Intuitions of Meaning and Greater Connectedness (Spirituality,
Inspiration) and Conclusion.
This
series of lectures is concerned with identifying various types of
self-awareness, in order to enhance this skill. In the first lecture I
offered general ideas about this effort at
increasing self-awareness. In the second lecture I offered a bit of an
overview on the nature of motivation. The third lecture reviewed some
of the more common ways that the mind wisely—and more frequently,
foolishly— works to resolve perceived conflicts between parts of the
mind or between the mind and the outer world. The basic idea is that
the more you know about what goes on, the more you can manage those
issues wisely. (I'll mention the themes in today's fourth lecture after
this next paragraph).
Next week we’ll look at becoming aware of those parts of your life that
are social, embedded in social networks, and the feelings associated
with relationships. And in the final lecture, we’ll discuss spiritual
and philosophical beliefs, assumptions, often subconscious, that affect
your sense of self.
So this fourth lecture addresses the following sub-topics: nonverbal
communications and the cues your body can give you; noticing your own
temperament; identifying abilities and relative disabilities; noting
special interests; and finally paying attention to even more subtle
hints from dreams, intuitions, and seeming coincidences.
Disclaimer
The mind is vast and there are many different ways to examining it,
scores of theories and thousands of variations of theory. So these
talks don’t pretend to be comprehensive, nor are they in any sense
objectively true: The mind, life, the world, the cosmos, all are viewed
through the worldviews available for a given historical era and
culture. Nevertheless, I’m doing this in the service of offering some
general introductory frameworks, and in promoting the general idea of
psychological literacy. You don’t need ultimate “truth,” which,
regarding mind, may never be able to be pinned down; you need useful
tools for practical living—or at least that’s the assumption that I
work from.
Cues From Your Body
Let’s begin with the world of body language, non-verbal communications.
At the more obvious level, most people notice some body cues, stronger
and more distinct emotions such as anger, fear, shame. But I don’t take
this for granted. Lots of folks block this aspect of their
self-awareness. A person can be profoundly aware of subtle shifts in,
say, manual dexterity, the feel of what she’s working on—in cooking,
dentistry, whatever—while in the realm of feelings be rather sealed
over, seemingly insensitive. We bring more consciousness to what seems
relevant and draw awareness and attention away from what seems
irrelevant—and the point here is that what is emotionally loaded can
register as insignificant—as in “Why should I think about things that
would upset me?” While in some families, passing along stories is a
tradition, many immigrants don’t want to tell the stories of their past
because it brings up too many painful memories.
So, back to the body, many cues of felt emotion are blocked. Some of
this is because of negative associations, but another common source of
this blockage is the lack of opportunity to talk about feelings. In
many families that kind of thing is pointedly avoided. Some of this is
the ignorance that goes with why bring up things that I have no way of
knowing what to say; and some of it is why remind me of my own
problematic and repressed feelings. Indeed, there are some people who
are so blocked from their feelings that everything they feel comes
through to their consciousness as one dominant feeling, such as
anxiety, irritation, anger, depression, or blankness—not feeling
anything. There’s a fancy name for this last condition: alexithymia,
meaning a: not; lexi, as in lecture, lectern—to read; and
thymia is emotion: They can’t identify any feelings, because to name
them would be too close to feeling them at what is intuitively sensed
to be an overwhelming degree.
Remember I spoke about learning to read your feelings is like learning
first the difference between feelings and thoughts—and that’s like
learning the difference between beer and wine. The next step is
learning to read you feelings as blends of the primary emotions of joy,
fear, anger, or sadness—and that’s like identifying the balance and
major taste components of wine—sour, sweet, and bitter (or dry).
The body is often a good help to remind you. If you think you’re calm
but your hands are balled in a fist, it may be that you’re more annoyed
than you knew. This is the whole point of developing a sharper degree
of self-awareness. Your body cues can be given more attention and
you’ll be surprised how much you discover!
Nonverbal communications are usually thought of as referring to how
people communicate to others, and that itself is a rich field that we
may look at more. The point today, though, is that you aren’t just
communicating to others, your body is communicating to you. I describe
the different categories of nonverbal communications and how you can learn more about them on other webpages..
The problem here is that what your body is reminding you of is a number
of attitudes, hyper-sensitivities, and feeling complexes that may not
be appropriate for the present situation.
Part of self-awareness involves learning to separate out the baby from
the bath-water, what to keep and what to let go of. Some of your
reactions are clues to present perceptions, and you should learn to
notice all of them. But you need not believe all that you feel. The key
to self-management is disconnecting from automatic responses, so that
you retain the choice as to whether or not you believe every thought
that pops into your head, or think that every feeling you experience is
valid. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn’t.
Learning nonverbal communication or body language is useful for a
variety of things interpersonally. Detectives and interviewers need
sharper skills, as well as those who are still dating. But we’re
talking about self-awareness, here, so what are the skills we mean?
Consider that you may have developed habits of how to use your body,
how to stand, how to maintain eye contact, and so forth, that express
old fears and defensive attitudes learned decades ago and perhaps no
longer necessary or true for you. When you know where to look, what to
look for, you find all sorts of stuff you didn’t know was there. This
is true in medicine, with microscopes, with blood tests, with xrays,
and it’s true in psychology.
Might you dare to consciously re-evaluate your voice tone and way of
speaking? It’s a role or skill you could cultivate. There’s learning a
new language, and this is a bit easier—it’s learning to speak more
slowly or clearly or loudly, or softly. Or learning to modulate habits
of speaking to fit the audience. For many people, well, you don’t hear
many people talk about this. I’ve been without a television set for 30
years so am not sure, but I don’t think this exists as a topic anywhere
on television. Does it?
How about shoulders. Now the thing here is that a 2% shift can be felt rather deeply as making a pretty important difference.
The field of nonverbal communications is rich, and the point to be made
here is that we not only communicate with others with the way we stand
or sit, our expressions, our voice tone, but we also communicate
unconsciously to ourselves. To feel more powerful or brave, we take on
a facial expression, "attitude," that we unconsciously believe will
intimidate others. To communicate a socially placating attitude, we may
compulsively smile or hold our head at a slight angle. The problem is
that some of these behaviors are learned in childhood and continue on
automatically. Sometimes they're adaptive in the here-and-now, and you
might want to continue to use them, at least in certain roles. But
almost certainly there are other roles where you do not want to do
these behaviors, and indeed may want to learn the opposite behaviors!
Role flexibility includes your repertoire of nonverbal communications.
The other key principle is that every time you do these behaviors your
body-mind reinforces certain feelings and thoughts that go with that
early reaction pattern. (The term "complex" implies that a reaction
pattern might include a variety of memories, feelings, body postures,
associated thoughts, and other associations, all mixed together.) To
learn more about the various nonverbal communications, look over my
website that discusses their different forms.
As you think and communicate with others, the body follows the mind’s
attitudes and expectations. Certain thoughts and relationships tend to
make you more tense and others relax you. If certain kinds of thoughts
or feelings are more fearful, you’ll subtly cringe, even if other parts
of you are trying to be brave. If you are feeling resentful but afraid
to show it, parts of your body will clench or in other ways express
that resentment.
The key point here is that nonverbal communications affect not only the
interpersonal field, but also operate within the mind-body. There are
books about how to read other people’s nonverbal messages—really, an
extensive literature—; fewer people appreciate that even as you may or
may not communicate effectively or obviously to others, at the same
time your body is reinforcing expressed or non-expressed attitudes.
Furthermore, the body-mind often expresses attitudes and feelings first
established years ago, in childhood, or in wartime, or in a long
relationship with other specific people—parents, spouse, siblings, etc.
It’s worthwhile learning to pay attention to how your body reacts in
various situations, to various words or tones of voice. You may have
thought you’ve grown away from those earlier influences, and in some
ways you probably have, but unless you notice these deeply-held feeling
complexes and work a bit to release them, they may continue in subtle
ways to influence present relationships in ways that you would not
intend.
For example, as a youngster, you may have felt intimidated by certain
people, or groups of people. Those feelings stay as habits of tension
in your body as well as your mind, and re-programming yourself begins
with noticing where you carry your tensions. You learn to do your own
internal psychological MRI scan. You learn to be sensitive to your gut
feelings, of when something just doesn’t feel right. You learn not to
automatically go with all those feelings— sometimes they no longer
apply in today’s situation— but to at least pay them heed. If they
don’t apply, you might want to bring them more to the surface and
re-program these complexes. This isn’t always easy, but it most
certainly can be done—at least to some degree.
Certain parts of the body are especially good signals, places to start:
Your shoulders—up or down, forward or back? Your eye contact—do you
find yourself tending to look away, or to look from the side—that’s the
meaning of looking askance. Your jaw—tight or relaxed. Do you find
yourself falling into a habit of forced smile? Do you feel compelled to
interrupt or to avoid interrupting at all costs? To speak softly so
that it’s hard ever to raise your voice? And so forth.
Sensory Awareness
One other kind of body awareness is learning to appreciate and enjoy
the many variations of touch, light massage, and the sensuality of the
skin. Movement and its enjoyment, stretching and other activities can
be discovered in gentle forms of dance and hatha yoga. Our culture has
become excessively avoidant of touch. It is taboo in the West (but not
in other cultures) for men to hold hands. So much is given a sexual
connotation. But there are many activities that can help people reclaim
their natural right to sensuality and touch---apart from genital
sexuality---and this topic deserves mention as one category wher you
could learn to be more aware of your body in a fun way.
Temperament
The next few items deal with your individuality, about which I spoke in
a previous lecture series. It's worthwhile identifying the elements
that make up your uniqueness (described in another webpage about individuality), also for the purposes of getting into greater harmony with them.
Let's begin with taking a look at your temperament: The key here is
that people do have ceratin natural tendencies, ideal rhythms, and so
forth. The point is that as I mentioned we tend to override our true
feelings.
Some of you have discovered your own natural waking and going-to-sleep
time, which may or may not fit with your spouse or other
considerations. We’re taught that waking early is noble, early to rise
is healthy, wealthy, and rise. Well, it’s a lie—at least for some
people. That’s the point here: As you get older you begin to get a
sense of all sorts of things because you’ve tried the other ways. But
cultural rules, shoulds and oughts die hard. So I’m here to invite you
to take stock of your natural preferences of all kinds, and to
acknowledge which rules or lifestyles work for you and which
over-stress you.
Because folks are different, I can’t be specific and say that travel is
great, it’s broadening, everyone should do it. Lots of folks don’t like
it and it doesn’t work with them. Some folks in our age group are still
trying to get clear on this. Should we try to do all the things we are
told are part of the cool, fashionable, mature, or just exciting things
that everyone else is doing? But you aren’t everyone else, and in
certain ways what fits for your life style may not fit for others.
For example, there’s temperament, and it’s worth learning about your
own, identifying your most natural way to function. During the
industrial era people were treated pretty much as replaceable parts in
a machine, in a factory, and in school, too, kids were all expected to
be able to learn everything well, and according to the teaching methods
of the teacher.
We now know that there are people—and kids—who perform much better,
think much better, relate to life better, if they align with their body
rhythms, of whether they do better getting up earlier or later in the
morning. The popular way to talk about these are in the analogy to the
birds, larks (for the morning) and owls, for night-owls. Are any of you
night-owls who do better if you can sleep later and hit your stride
more in the afternoon or evening? Or married to anyone like this? And
then there are some who really enjoy getting up early, and tend to hit
the sack earlier, too. This is temperament, and society still isn’t
oriented to having different kinds of folks.
Those who like it cooler or warmer, those who like the seashore or the
mountains. Help me out here, because this theme applies to all manner
of people. Introvert or extravert—Carl Jung was one of the first depth
psychologists who noted that people really have different
temperaments...though other psychologists also note this fact.
Google temperament– there are various schemes that claim that there are
four main kinds, or nine, or some other set. I don’t think that the
mind fits neatly into any particular scheme, but some sets may be more
or less useful for you.
Analyzing your temperament is not exactly a matter of strength or
weakness. There is relatively little you can do to take remedial
action. Part of the art of life is to discover your innate temperament
and work out ways of harmonizing with it.
It turns out that a few of you have married or been raised with parents
or compared with siblings who had different temperaments than you. Some
were more quiet, obedient, and you were perhaps too rambunctious for
them. Some who have been married more than once and perhaps (not
necessarily) happier the second time discovered that certain kinds of
temperamental compatibility counts more than whatever the criterion was
that you were using for choosing a spouse when you were much younger.
Some of you have found that you can’t fight your natural preferences
and have to live in a climate that fits your temperature and humidity
comfort zone.
Abilities and Disabilities
Another set of themes is your various areas of strength and weakness.
One of the best pieces of advice I read was that we should find out
what we don’t do well and not do it. Delegate it if at all possible.
Play to your strengths. Sometimes you have to compromise, but the
beauty of this concept is that it goes against the way we were raised:
That we should be good at everything if we just try. There are certain
things I do quite well, and other things that I do poorly. Some I could
perhaps bring up to a middling level, but why try? Some I need to try,
but some I don’t. This idea of discovering strengths and weaknesses and
opening our mind to self-acceptance has a lot of value.
It applies in marriages and families, too. If there are certain skills
that come easily to you, there’s a tendency to assume that others will
be able to do it easily, also. I mean, how hard can it be? It turns out
that this is one of the egocentric attitudes that our culture’s
blindness to individual differences made worse. It would be better to
have classes on individual difference in middle school, and to
recognize differences in learning style, cognitive style, ability—and
to use this also with vocational counseling. It would appeal to the
desire of that age for self-knowledge, and it might soften the
ubiquitous sense of inferiority and competitiveness that arrives with
the developmental emergence of a certain level of self-consciousness at
that age. The point to build in is that it’s okay to be good at some
things and not-good at others. Some of you again have had to work this
out in marriage. One dances well, the other doesn’t; or directions—one
has a fairly good sense of direction—who here knows which way is
north?—and others don’t.
Abilities
Most people are marginal in a whole bunch of ways, and folks have been
brainwashed to think that they are better than they are in how well
they drive, how well they do their job, etc. Taking that driver
education course every few years is an eye-opener to how subtly
careless and over-confident I tend to become. How good are you really,
and can you handle a good friend telling you the truth? What if you’re
not that good and could do with some extra training?
There’s a balance here. In some ways it may be fine to accept being
mediocre. There’s a shift in the old rule book. You want to re-think
how many ways you can improve your skill within the finite realities of
time and energy and priorities.
Another thing about skills. Back to Charlie Brown: He’s made out to be
from the start a particularly inept person in a variety of skill
areas—especially regarding competition. I wonder how many people notice
that he’s peculiarly gifted in a certain way. Any guesses? Yes,
he is able to bounce back, to cheer up, to open to happiness and trying
again in a way that is quite out of character. On one hand it makes the
play as far from the realities of child psychology as Snoopy acting as
a real dog. Dogs don’t really act like Snoopy. Don’t get me wrong—I
love Snoopy, and in some ways want to grow up to be like him. I love
his flagrant willingness to fantasize! Back to Charlie Brown. It
occurred to me that he excels spiritually. He renews his faith. It may
be too much of a reach to say he’s a hidden Christ-figure as a literary
symbol, but sports is not his metier, his strength area—and what the
play—and playwrights too, perhaps—because they represent the mass
culture---miss is that winning really truly is not everything.
The point is to learn to accept with good humor the ways you have your own ways of being in the world.
Tastes
Another aspect of individuality is the way that you have developed your
own tastes in food, music, art, dance, home decoration, and so forth.
In a similar way, here’s another category—particuliar tastes and
images. We can’t explain all this, and it’s okay. Some of the things
you’ve become interested in early or later in life, favorite types of
music, art, certain historical eras, people, countries... And the point
is to honor this in yourself and others, to realize this is part of
individuality. You don’t need to be able to give reasons for it, or ask
others to justify their liking of this or that subject or sport. The
point is to know this category exists and it’s useful for
conversations.
I have on my website a paper on individuality and I mention these
categories. Part of self-awareness is to gradually get to know aspects
of these in yourself. Take your time—a comprehensive analysis may not
be helpful if thought of as once and for all time—I suspect folks shift
during their lifetimes in some areas. The point is just to be able to
talk about with others, and the second point is to notice that you may
have felt at one point—or still—a bit defensive or embarrassed about
your own profile. I might call them quirks, but that suggests that they
are very very eccentric, and my point is to dissolve this kind of
thinking. Learn to celebrate your uniqueness.
Historical and Cultural Influences
The fourth category is important from several angles—this is the
influence of your cultural, sub-cultural, historical, and family
background. One angle is that comparing backgrounds can be helpful for
identifying tastes and ideas—how they fit with or contrasted with the
preferences of your culture, religion, age group, historical era.
Another angle is to use your background to re-examine prejudices,
biases, not just cultural or racial, but also historical. We grew up
with values that might not be the same as those of our kids or
grandkids, and I keep finding certain things that I sort of took for
granted that, on reflection, were outmoded. For example, several years
ago I was wanting my kids to participate in an extended family
get-together. It would have cost us a lot of money and it became clear
that neither they nor their cousins—mostly second cousins—shared this
value that I got from my family. I realized that we live in a more
mobile culture and kinship is not the basis for relevance in social
connection. This varies among families, but the point is that I was
holding to an out of fashion value.
The key point is not to agree or discard values—as I’ve said a couple
of times—that’s something you’re free to do at the end of consciously
re-evaluating the situation. (That song by Fagin in Oliver—I’m
re-thinking the situation...).. The key is becoming aware of the
different nooks and crannies in yourself so you can even become aware
that certain assumptions may no longer apply.
In our changing world, the need to re-examine assumptions becomes
ever-more relevant. We meet more people from different cultures,
different lifestyles. There’s also a category that tends to be avoided,
but it is real: Class. This is fuzzy, because it’s not just money, but
way-of-life. There are people with more money who think more like a
lower class; and people who have less income but they operate with
middle-class values. Occasionally you hear of the aristocratic poor
person, who depends on the kindness of strangers—I’ve read a few
stories, but not encountered any. Point is that there are whole sets of
tastes and expectations that clash—I read an article about new
money—the nouveau riche— and their tastes and styles, and how they’re
moving into neighborhoods where old money, more established ways of
being—has lived, and what the impact has been. Changes in the South,
from old south and new south, are not exactly class, but sort of.
Deep preference and prejudices.
Prejudices are interesting. These may be a mixture of temperament,
tastes, and cultural pressures. They’re not easy to change, or at least
some of the thoughts associated with them. Class, values, desire for
learning, middle class, overlap.
Smoking, loudness or edge of voice, tattoos, swearing, etc. For some,
race, this is part of the process of generalization. If you’ve been
traumatized, beaten up, teased, or even just intimidated by any class
of people, or terrorized or propagandized—told that they are all
dangerous— as some sub-cultures have taught their kids about variously
catholics, jews, white people, any other race, religion, ethnicity,— it
becomes difficult to open to anyone associated with that category. It’s
not impossible, but it is difficult, or in some cases, with some
groups, easy—
Back to our own historical background. There are a number of wonderful
and interesting qualities in being born in this era, advantages that
people in the past didn’t have, and in some ways advantages even over
younger people born more recently. But there are a certain percentage
of those elements that aren’t so great—if for no other reason than they
impress themselves on our minds as the way things are and, worse,
should be. But not if you really think about it.
Which rules did kids growing up in the mid-20th century —inner rules—
which ones were good and which ones were not so good. There’s the don’t
throw the baby out with the bathwater process here. I’ll speak for
myself to warm us up and hope you’ll throw in some too. The category is
about cultural influences that were historically based: There are tons
of them. I used to think that patriotism was great; went through a
mid-point in my life where is was okay, but nothing to get sentimental
about—and of course the whole country was in an uproar around the
Vietnam era about whether patriotism meant supporting the government’s
foreign policy—and then coming back to a deeper enjoyment of patriotism
even when again lots of people didn’t agree with certain government
policies. Cursing was another back and forth thing—for a while
from the late 50s through the 70s cussing was cool in certain regions.
This I’ve found to be still true in other parts of the world and among
certain generational groups and classes. But again I’ve pulled
back—partly from traveling among a wider mix of folks, and now feel
uncomfortable with the free use of what used to be called dirty
words. So it’s not all rebellion, it’s more
present-oriented conscious choice.
Here’s a rule in my rule book that was pretty common: I should get all
As, and by implication, I should be great in every way. I could be,
too, if I just tried hard enough, and there was no upper limit on how
hard I should try. That one caused me some grief, because I’ve
discovered that some things come much easier to some people than
others—it’s called talent, or different kinds of intelligence. I’ve
replaced that rule with a sort of turn-about: Discover what you do not
do well and if at all possible, don’t do it. Avoid it if it isn’t
important. Or if it is necessary, Delegate it out, pay someone to do
it—it will be well worth the money!
Looking back, 34% of my neuroses weren’t personal but cultural,
outmoded rules or rules that were overly general, mistaken, or in other
ways wrong to begin with. A lot of what we called common sense was
really more collective prejudice. Two hundred years earlier, slavery
was culturally okay—at least to most people. One hundred years ago the
status of women was still pretty iffy, half subjugated. And it was
oppression because most women bought in and could hardly think of a way
it should be different.
Could the way we run our schools be less than perfect? Dare we imagine
alternatives? What about the way we run our—dare I say it—religion? Oh,
of course, we don’t run it, religion is determined by God. Wait—that’s
denying that religion might in fact be determined by the way actual
people—mainly older men—INTERPRET the writings of other older men who
interpreted the writings of other older men several times over about
what they thought God said or did. Can we dare revise what we choose to
believe considering what we’ve learned and what needs to be paid
attention to today?
One of the things I learned was history—but it was taught as the way
things happened and how great we were—which denied or numbed our mind
from considering that there are a lot of the ways we run our country
that might—just might—be done better if done differently—what and how
and how much we tax, how we vote, the electoral college, etc.— can
these be re-evaluated? I didn’t know these were choices we are
continuing to make by pretending the decision has been made by those
who know better than us. Maybe—just maybe—they, our elected
representatives—don’t always know better. Maybe some should be voted
out and others voted in. This was not part of our high school
education. This realm of preferences also will be discussed in the next
lecture on social connectedness.
Intuition, Dreams, Synchronicity
The last topic to be discussed today is one I’ve become more interested
in—the place of intuition and imagination, dreams and psychic
experiences. When I grew up all this was nonsense. Or the Freudians had
these all reduced to forms of neurotic complex. A sad and funny thing
about a flexible enough system like psychology is that it can manage to
explain to its own satisfaction just about anything. That’s why they
were called shrinks. I’m an expander, and my goal is to help clients
discover aspects that I may not be able to understand or explain, nor
do I feel obligated to do so, nor do I think that they must be
explained in order to be practically utilized in life.
There’s a good book in the Austin Library that helped me articulate all this, titled the Three Only Things—intuition,
dreams, and meaningful coincidences—Jung called them “synchronicities”
– meaning occurring at the same time, syn toghether as in
symphony and chronos, time. All this was marginalized,
pushed to the margins, don’t pay any attention to it. If we can’t pin
down whether it was fully factual, materially real, then we tended to
dismiss it as unworthy of being considered. Dreams, intuitions,
meaningful coincidences—you’ve all had them.
Here’s where I bridge slightly into the sixth lecture—because one of
the key themes of self awareness is that you may be even more than you
thought you were.
We’re taught to identify with our conscious self. The Freudians tended
to treat the unconscious as mainly where you stuff stuff that you don’t
want to know about—what I talked about as repression. And that’s true,
but it’s only a small part of the unconscious. There’s another much
much bigger part, that operates as the source also of insights,
breakthroughs, spontaneity, creativity—and part of self-awareness in my
opinion involves getting to know that it’s there and it can be
valuable.
Now the trouble with all this stuff is that it’s neither good or bad in
itself, but becomes such depending on what you make of it. The
conscious part tends to deal with this material in a more or less aware
manner, and to impose its own expectations on what is experienced. The
art of self-awareness is also an artful opening. It’s learning to take
a stance of curiosity but not literal credulity: You don’t have to
believe every hunch or dream or vision that comes along.
I spoke in the past lectures how the mind tends to get lazy and want
someone else to be the parent, make the hard decisions, not have to
take responsibility and perhaps blame if it goes wrong. This is not
only somewhat childish, but also is the slave mentality, and it is very
pervasive among adults. It wants answers, it feels entitled to them,
and is willing to think of situations as punishments for bad behavior
or thoughts rather than opportunities to re-think and re-plan our ideas
about who we are and what we need to do next.
About dreams, I’m closer to Jung. It may be that they’re just brain
stories, but I find that they are rich enough to be in the role of
little artsy movies played by my unconscious—with the variation that
sometimes I’m in these stories, and my emotional reactions—whether I
feel excited or frightened, sexually or romantically turned on or
alienated and despairing—these are also clues. I find the most useful
way to relate to dreams is that I imagine that my subconscious mind is
trying to tell me things.
Now I don’t know about you, but reading doesn’t work. I not
infrequently enjoy looking at newpaper comic strips in dreams, but I
can’t actually read the words. My dream-masters know that they can’t
tell me in analytic terms what my situation is, so they construct a
story, an image, that can break through my mental scattered-ness. I
sometimes talk about these images with my wife and in talking about
them—self-dream-analysis—with input also from Allee— I start realizing
that the dream-masters are doing a “This is Your Life” trip on
me—remember that 1950s television show—was it with Art Linkletter?—
Point is that dream work can enhance the personal journey.
Intuitions can also be a subtle source of self-awareness. The lessons
are less clear, but it’s more a life style, a habit of thinking that
you’re developing, so that you include in your view of yourself and
your life a richer fabric of inputs.
Summary
The mind is vast and there are many things of which we can become
aware. I spoke of motives, and also the more foolish ways we can cope
with conflicts among our motives, or with less mature motives. Today
we’ll talk about some other ways of looking at the complexities of self.
I consider the journey to self-awareness as one which can last a
lifetime, and it’s okay not to come to final answers. The key is to get
a sense of what you can change and perhaps should try to, and what
perhaps you shouldn’t try that hard to change. EndBody Cues
The field of nonverbal communications is rich, and the point to be made
here is that we not only communicate with others with the way we stand
or sit, our expressions, our voice tone, but we also communicate
unconsciously to ourselves. To feel more powerful or brave, we take on
a facial expression, "attitude," that we unconsciously believe will
intimidate others. To communicate a socially placating attitude, we may
compulsively smile or hold our head at a slight angle. The problem is
that some of these behaviors are learned in childhood and continue on
automatically. Sometimes they're adaptive in the here-and-now, and you
might want to continue to use them, at least in certain roles. But
almost certainly there are other roles where you do not want to do
these behaviors, and indeed may want to learn the opposite behaviors!
Role flexibility includes your repertoire of nonverbal communications.
The other key principle is that every time you do these behaviors your
body-mind reinforces certain feelings and thoughts that go with that
early reaction pattern. (The term "complex" implies that a reaction
pattern might include a variety of memories, feelings, body postures,
associated thoughts, and other associations, all mixed together.) To
learn more about the various nonverbal communications, look over my website that discusses their different forms.
d
d
d
d