Posted, November, 2,
2011
(This webpage is another supplement
to a workshop given on November 4, 2011 at the annual
conference of the National Association for Drama Therapy.
A different and complementary supplement
is posted elsewhere on this website, a supplement to a
presentation in April 2011 for the conference of theAmerican
Society for Group Psychotherapy and Psychodrama in Clearwater,
Florida.)
This workshop has a few minor changes, was co-led with my wife,
Allee Blatner, and I have some more ideas to post here. Also, I
post this at a different place in the table of contents of
papers, under “Spirituality”— with a link to the other webpage.
Beyond Techniques
One concept that has impressed me is the
presence of
others who really are interested, who want to function
to draw the protagonist forward. One functions as a
director/facilitator, and the other as an audience and available
to be a double, play a role of some other figure in the
exploration, what Moreno called an “auxiliary ego.” Having two
others who become “friends” in a sense, who are willing to
devote perhaps fifteen minutes to not getting into their own
stuff, but rather to serve the protagonist in his or her
exploration. It’s understood that the person who takes the role
of the protagonist for a while will re-enter a later enactment
or exploration in one of the other roles—director or auxiliary
ego—to help bring that other person forward. In other words, in
groups of three or four, participants “take turns.”
The key is the power of social connectedness, of someone being
engaged with you. For a time you become the center of attention!
How wonderful! We should on occasion do this quite explicitly.
So many people cannot take the stage even for a minute without
feeling apologetic for using up other people’s time and
attention, and this is because others have not explicitly agreed
to play this way. So having a bit of structure allows for the
reduction of this kind of resistance or inhibited warm-up.
Developments in social psychology and neuroscience in the last
few decades have demonstrated ever more vividly the power of
social connectedness, the exquisite and largely unconscious
sensitivity to receptivity and reciprocity by others---or the
absence of these dynamics. I have realized that becoming aware
that others are really interested in you and not just waiting
their turn to get attention for themselves is (alas) not that
common in our fragmented culture, so making a point of such
moments of positive tele or rapport can do much to help us. (See
more recent papers on the
dynamics of rapport on this website.)
Demystifying
Mysticism
Another
recent presentation covers further ideas about
spirituality. Essentially, I make the point that mysticism
might best be thought of as intensive spirituality. The
valued of mysticism is that mystics sometimes come up with
great ideas that can be used by those beginning to exercise
their spirituality, just like master chefs can come up with
ideas that can then be used by beginning cooks, or master
composers can invent new ideas in music that a half-century
later have become part of the mainstream practice of many
less accomplished musicians.
The Axis
of Inspiration
Redemption of the freedom to imagine, or to think
independently, or to own one’s sensuality, or any other
dimension of the psyche that may have been repressed in
childhood as one accommodated to the definitions of the
religious beliefs of one’s elders (parents or teachers).
Many have gone through a phase where it is difficult to find
what is useful in spirituality apart from what has been
found to be oppressive. To distill out what is valuable
might be recognizeed as itself being both a spiritual and a
heroic quest.
In a related way, our culture has not in general clearly
recognized that moving to a more inclusive spirituality is
also a journey for some. What I call the “axis of
inspiration” parallels the chakra system of Kundalini Yoga:
For some, moving from a religion of fear to one of love is
progress (i.e., from first to 2nd chakra). For some, moving
from love to social action, becoming effective, needed,
active instead of passive in a role in one’s church—that
might be viewed as moving from 2nd to 3rd chakra. Moving to
4th (heart) chakra might involve those who are seeking to be
more inclusive in their spirituality, including, for
example, people of other religions.
Fifth-chakra spirituality interests me: Can we find “flow”
or a surrender into spontaneity as part of our being, and
recognize that there are spiritual elements here, too? Can
the arts be vehicles for feeling more connected to the
Whole? Well, it works for me in music, singing, drama,
dance, art, and other activities: When I let go and “it”
does it—or perhaps “they” or the muses or angels, whatever,
it tends to bring forth a sense of amused wonder. Most folks
have experienced “flow” sometimes, and I suspect this might
also become recognized as a kind of spirituality.
What makes this difficult is that spirituality has been
under the domination of the unspoken expectations of what is
and is not proper, and for many this has been a somewhat
solemn type of piety that values self-containment,
submission, blind obedience, and a stifling of any traces of
individuality or spontaneity. Such qualities are mistakenly
associated with immaturity rather than vitality, and in that
mistaken view, worthy of repression. Turning that around
becomes a common theme in the spiritual journey of those
involved with the arts.
The
Workshop Outline:
Following the definition of spirituality---an activity of
seeking greater connectedness, deepening one’s relationship with
whatever seems deeply higher. The object may vary with culture
and I need not name it. For some it’s God, for others, Goddess,
Great Spirit, the clear light—it may be personal or impersonal,
with or without form---I then note that spirituality as a
general category of activity may include many sub-activities.
The challenge involves finding what works for you varies with
your temperament and other aspects of your individuality.
There’s also your history with the activity—and generally that
means your history of religion—which I define as the social
organization of the spiritual impulse. All these can be
facilitated by some action methods.The techniques well learn
about today through experiential modes, action exercises, may be
used for your own life journeys as well as by you for the
benefit of your clients. In attending to the overall group
process, I’ve planned breaks for going to the bathroom about
half-way through.
Let’s warm up by considering together what some spiritual themes
are: What general ideas occurs to you in association with the
general notion of spiritual journey? (Write on pad)
This need not be reflective of your own personal life at this
stage—it can reflect themes in the lives of clients and
acquaintances, what’s been happening or not happening in the
lives of family members, etc. Let’s put them up on the board. (A
principle of group work is that the more one sees what others
are thinking, the more it stimulates new thoughts.)
Confidentiality
Although this is about you and for some, your work with your
clients, one way to learn this is to allow yourself to learn it
about your own life. Lest this process be inhibited by worries
about confidentiality, let’s just agree together too keep this
confidential. I want you to share and talk about the general
principles noted in this workshop, but it’s no one else’s
business to hear about any particulars of what was shared with
you by anyone else. To affirm this with bodies as well as
voices, let’s all get up and stand in a circle, where we can
look in each others’ eyes. This is also part of the warming-up
process, helping people to feel
safe. We express our willingness
to honor the confidentiality of what happens in this room by
taking a step forward, like this. This means that I am willing
to abide by this rule in my mind and heart, and I want you to do
likewise. If you feel the same, please look around and take one
step forward.
Step-In Sociometry
Another warm-up also uses the circle energy. The circle
represents a symbol of coherence. Let’s further the emergence of
group cohesion by continuing this activity for a while. There’s
another warm-up technique I first saw Dorothy Satten do this
many years ago. Not everyone has shared a given experience, but
it’s good to know if anyone else in the group has. So, for
example, we’ll ask a question and if it applies to you, take one
step forward and look around to see who else it applies to. For
example, Have you had what you would call a significant
spiritual experience? Other questions to promote self-disclosure
and increase tele include:
- Who here still practices the religion you were raised
with?
- Who here has consciously put together two or more
spiritual paths so that what works for you cannot be classified?
- who has been abused or betrayed by minister, guru or
community
-
has become dissatisfied with religion and dropped out
- Who has an active spiritual practice now
- Who here are actively seeking a spiritual practice in
contrast to having found one that works okay...
- Who are here just interested in the subject
The point is that you’re not that alone—often there are others
who have shared your predicament. And if there are none in the
group, these folks probably have some friends for whom it’s so.
Spectrograms
To continue the warming up process, let’s move the group around
a little. To help group members to appreciate the diversity of
sentiments another good warm-up technique is the
spectrogram. So, to bring out the diversity, here are some
questions we might ask:
-Those who have been on a spiritual
journey for the longest time, even if you’ve kind of found what
you want. On this end. Those who feel they’re just starting out,
or aren’t sure if they even want to do that kind of thing—on
this end.
- Those who feel presently a fair amount of conflict or
pain on this end, those feeling joy and serenity on this end.
- Those who are working with at least one client in which
this issue is a significant part of their issues—the more the
better—on this end. Those who have no one they’re helping with
this except themselves on that end.
- Really powerful transpersonal
experience Never had a powerful
transpersonal
- How many different spiritual communies or paths
have you participated in
Many None
- Comfortable in a spiritual
path
Uncomfortable in or not in
What other variables shall we explore?
Time Line
The next warm-up technique is a time line. This is done by
yourself, paper-and-pencil---at least at first. Later you’ll
talk about it with a partner. Diagraming and art therapy
techniques are also action approaches. Start with your birth and
take it to now, and place somewhere along this line—mark the
approximate ages, five to fifteen significant events that have
relevance to your spiritual journey. These events may or may not
have much relevance to other roles, career, marriage, etc. .
We’ll give you about 10 minutes to do this.
Sociometric
Choice of Partner
Look around the room—register a couple of people you might enjoy
sharing your story with, knowing each person will only take
about 5 minutes each. When you’ve found your partner after I say
“go,” move out of the center of the room so others can find
their links. After this exercise we’ll have a bathroom
break for 10 minutes. Move somewhere,
sit down, and discuss your time line. Go.
(Bathroom
Break)
In workshops, it's helpful to do this about an hour into the
process. "If you finish early can take a break to go to the
bathroom; please be back here in 10' or less.
Time Line
(continued)
About the time line, you can also do that as an action
experience in small groups, with having the person move along
the line, state what’s happening, and then perhaps going back
and building a psychodrama based on one of those events.
Based on your time line, let’s add to the
list, noting evocative places, persons, books, ideas, teachers
who have been spiritually meaningful. This again warms you up to
recognizing that each of these is a role fragment if not a role,
a little character presenting that whatever and reminding you
what it’s about. We’re talking about inner roles.
The
Spiritual Network Diagram
This is an extension of Moreno's use of the "social atom."
Generally that involves plotting those people or figures (it
could include pets, figures who have died, etc.) who are
meaningful. This variant emphasizes people, authors, prophets,
those you admire, and also, perhaps equally significantly, your
own inner roles, your true believer, skeptic, questioner,
wanting to join with others, solitude, etc. That is, the network
may include some of your major outward relationships, but
there are a host of roles inside you, too, and they can be
identified more clearly and plotted in a diagram—an inner social
atom. Indeed, there are so many that you could do inner social
atoms of several major domains in life, your work, your romance
or marriage, your parenting, your relationship with your own
parents.. But we’re going to note that just within
the spiritual or religious realm there’s a potential for a good
many roles!
For example, I’ll plot out
mine—and following this demonstration, you’ll all be doing your
own—another diagram...
I mentioned
auto-tele in the blurb and what that’s about is that I have
better tele with some roles than with others. I have mixed tele,
and even negative tele, So here's another paper and pencil
exercise
Draw your own spiritual social network. Take about ten minutes.
Like the time line.
Another sociometric choice: The criterion will be not only
someone with whom you share your drawing, but someone who you’ll
allow to direct you in an encounter with one of the figures in
your inner world. Gather in a circle. Look around: Choose.
Move out of the center of the room when you’ve connected, find a
place to sit down and again, about 5 minutes each, share your
spiritual inner social atoms.
All these are not only ways of
exploring your inner world, but are also warm-ups to deeper
explorations. One of these I call spiritual dialogue. Sometimes
you can do this with real people, but most often it’s a matter
of finding out what your unconscious fantasies are about the
other or the situation— so we use surplus reality and a
variation of the empty chair technique.
I’ll
demonstrate with a volunteer:
Inner
Dialogue
Well,
this is externalized, and your partner takes the role of
the facilitator for about ten mintues You do an
empty chair dialogue. Your partner is a combination
director, at times double, and witness-audience to your
exploration. There will be no repeat performance for any
outside audience---the process is enough. Encounter the
other and then dare to imagine yourself as the
other---even if it's Jesus, an angel, God, whatever. It's
understood that you (ego you) cannot really know what it's
like or "be" the far wiser, deeper other---or even if you
pick a shadow role to investigate, an incredibly subtle
and clever other. But just opening your conscious mind to
wondering in this fashion helps to move the spiritual
quest along a little.
So. With your partner serving now as your
director, one of you for five to ten minutes have a
back-and-forth dialogue with someone or something—magic
can give it a voice---in your inner spiritual social
network. About 20 minutes.
Sharing
and Questions.
Appendix
1: Related Themes see webpage on this website:
Spiritual Issues in
Psychotherapy.
spiritual abuse see webpage about this:
psychic or mystical experience
LSD or other psychedelic trip
Other religious practices
Obstacles
Addiction
Misunderstandings
Heresy
Evolution of spirituality / religion
Undigested experience
Conflict with close other..
Items
for Step-In (Circle) Sociometry
Items
for Spectrogram
- - -
Examples spiritual roles
Tree she loves. In nature
some
of the following “spiritual” roles are relevant in your
life:
Believer in (name of higher being, truth of scripture,
this or that specific part of the dogma of some system)
true
believer, aspiring to mystical experience, seeking
enlightenment, etc.
Adam’s inner social network...
Uncle Bud, agent, like Virgil was for
Dante, guide, translator
Angelic committee talks too fast
God lady garments sequins on a button
also creative advance
Whitehead and Hartshorne and
others process...
Jung a bit...
Moreno a bit, mixed
Some ancient
kabbalist and the Tree
The
Geometer... and artist
Creator
story, a more dynamic version of neo-Spinozan deism
Traditional god and doctrine... don’t work for me and feel
wrong, though I know they work fine for others...
People drawing me
back, guilt-tripping, ethnic ground..
More General Roles for Inner Social Atom
Believer literally in x; or believer allegorically or
in some more subtle way in x or y.
(Each affirmation of a belief is a role or role fragment. One
could play the role of affirming, even arguing for this
position.
- Active non-believer in (any of the above elements); or “I
believe x but not y.”
- Active unsure whether or not to believe in ___
- Wanting to Argue with Inner relative, friend, partner who
wouldn’t agree wth you
- Wanting to avoid the whole topic
- Would like favorite author (theologian, sage, guru) (dead or
alive) to be here to help. (This is a role: If x were here I
can imagine him saying...)
- Favorite Teachers or Authors if they’re alive in you even a
bit
- Favorite antagonists who you’d like to argue with and have
them hear your protests
- Higher Self, conscience, ideal, giving guidance
- Magical savior, messiah, make-it-all-better spiritual force
or personality
- Potentially punishing law-giver
- Doubter about this bit of dogma, belief
- Unworthy Self
- Witness or missionary, or inspired to write, comment,
invent—and one knows one’s own purpose or tools
- Feeling obliged to witness, but, more commonly, not knowing
what to do
... and so forth. (I welcome your suggestions.)
I am open to and interested in
your feedback. Email me at adam@blatner.com