Autobiographical
Notes:
Adam Blatner
December
10, 2006 (In addition to the general biographical outline
that can be read by clicking the bio section above, this amplifies some
of those details.) Further notes will be added as time
passes.
I think aspects of
the story of my life might be of interest because they witness to a
number of important cultural shifts that operated in my lifetime. Some
began in earnest, though some precursors (of course) might be
discerned, while others continued and evolved. I have been fortunate, I
feel, in being a part of these, even if only, as I sometimes put it,
“on the outer fringes of the cutting edge.”
Professionally,
I have been affiliated with the general fields of psychology, medicine,
psychiatry, psychotherapy, and related endeavors. In these roles, I’ve
been part of:
– the height of
the fashion of psychoanalysis in psychiatry, and its somewhat
precipitous decline
– the emergence
of a stronger trend towards medical treatments, medicines for
psychiatric illnesses, and research in neuro-science
– the
flourishing of alternative approaches to psychoanalysis as more
efficient and holistic approaches to psychotherapy
– the emergence
of a sense of rational eclecticism, a search for common denominators
and ways to theoretically and practically move towards integration of
the best insights and techniques derived from the aforementioned
proliferation of approaches
– more
specifically, I’ve been active in systematically organizing and
presenting the theoretical and practical foundations of psychodrama,
therapeutic role playing, and helping to build scholarly bridges with
its related fields such as drama therapy, group psychotherapy, family
therapy, and so on.
– the
emergence of humanistic psychology, the encounter group, and the human
potential movement, its fashionable phase, and its continuing more
subtle influence.
– the
emergence of new trends towards integrating spirituality and
psychotherapy, at first through the field called “transpersonal
psychology.”
-- the shift from using psychology mainly in the clinical field to
applying it more in the mainstream culture (i.e., in business,
education, religion, community-building, everyday life)-- what I've
called "psychological-ization."
-- adding also the domains of imaginativeness, play, and other aspects
that I've called "re-enchantment" and "spiritual-ization"-- both in
enriching and modifying religion and in general endeavors apart from
religion
For more playful explorations of such dimensions, see "Adam ManyParts" and his cartoon biography.
-- harvesting the best insights of Alfred North Whitehead's
philosophical ideas and applying them also in the aforementioned
contexts.
(As a hobby, I
became interested in the history of medicine as a more specific
“window” on the history of humanity in general. At times, this
perspective has aided me in my other endeavors.)
Personally, I’m
aware of a number of other trends that I have participated in and
reflected upon:
– a stable
childhood and adolescence in the 50s and its emergence (just before the
“boomer generation) into the postmodern era
– a process of
assimilation, ethnically, from my background as an Americanized Jew
with parents who immigrated from Eastern Europe when they were younger,
noting this process over several generations and reflecting on the
assimilation and acculturation of other ethnic groups
– a process of
loss of connection with religion and an interesting and rich story of
how I re-connected in some unconventional ways
– a weaving
together of interests in various subjects and an indirect commentary on
their cultural evolution, also, including:
– singing, popular songs, kids’ songs from camp, novelty and funny
songs, folk songs and their fashion in the 1950s, holding song fests,
compiling song sheets and booklets; reflecting on the dilution of the
nature of popular songs as understandable (i.e., you can hear the words
distinctly), singable, memorize-able.
– dancing, first ballroom, then international folk dancing; later,
square and round dancing; reflecting on the dilution of the idea of
dancing with steps.
– cartooning, starting with an interest in comics, influenced by the EC
Comic artists (science fiction, horror comics, MAD comics), later
influences in Mayan writing systems, other alphabets, geometry,
etc. Enjoyment of cartoon- like art by others. (See cartoon bio)
– humor and the enjoyment and following of types of humorists,
comedians, etc.
–
history, with slight emphasis on military history, the history of the
Jews, and in later life, the history of writing systems, all of which
served as lenses for examining the richness and depth of history
itself. Many other types have also been included in the reading.
– general reading, loving libraries, browsing, reading quickly and
slowly in many fields.
--
investing in a diversified life, maintaining connections and
involvements with nuclear and extended family, friends, and community
-- walking, working out at the fitness center,
riding my bike, etc.
... and though I
did a fair amount of travel as a young-middle adult, and more
associated with professional conferences, I’ve never gotten much out of
travel, nor been much interested in it. Similarly, sports has been
uninteresting to me. I felt a bit “different,” for a while, but have
come to respect my own focus on what I am interested in—really a rather
broad range of things, but not everything!
Cultural
Criticism
Perhaps
the most relevant part of my autobiography, though, has been a process
I’ve found especially fascinating: Many of the social norms, role
definitions, and assumptions about values that I learned as a youngster
I’ve found to be misleading, over-generalized, and not infrequently
flat wrong. This has come out of my own personal re-evaluations (also
known as a partial self-analysis, much done with the help of my wife,
Alle); from my work with patients in psychotherapy whose problems, it
occurred to me, arose in part due to the playing out the rules of life
they’d been taught not just by their family, but by the mainstream
culture!; and in part from a tendency to reflect on life.
I will confess
to having been in part infused with a psychoanalytic sensibility, and
while I criticize Freud and his followers in many ways, I also honor
that there are a number of elements that I have not only found most
useful, but they represent deep values: I believe in systematic
intellectual humility, knowing that I am infused with patterns and
temptations for self-deception. Part of my life play has been the
detective game of discerning these and correcting them. It seems
un-ending, but not at all disheartening.
I also have a
bit of Buddhist or trans-personal perspective, reinforced by other
studies in esoteric fields, such as the Jewish mystical tradition of
kabbalah. In short, I view life largely as a construction of mind,
individual and collective, and in general, I see our own age as being
in the midst of a paradigm shift: Moving away from the materialism,
scientism, reductionism, positivism, and over-valuing of rationalism
that characterized the height of the spirit of modernity—a sensibility
still quite pervasive in our culture—, I see a shift towards a
re-balancing with a greater respect for the proper exercise of
trans-rational thought, emotion, empathy, imagination, playfulness,
spontaneity, and a degree of phenomenology and holism in philosophy. I
temper this with a mild dose of postmodernist philosophy—note, only a
mild dose, because there is much in postmodernism that, when taken too
seriously or over-used, seem to me to be foolish—, the general
perspective is, shall we say, simply, reflective. I think not only
about thinking (i.e., meta-cognition), but also thinking about what it
means, culturally, spiritually, psychologically, and from an
evolutionary perspective, to reflect also on what it might mean that
increasing people are being reflective (i.e., meta-meta-cognition).
These complex
aspirations and tendencies to be a visionary in themselves make no
claim to being right or accurate. I continue to learn, revise, refine,
and am certain only that in several hundred years my approach may be
appreciated as at best relatively useful to others in the evolution of
consciousness; at worst, well, with some indulgence, that I probed some
ideas that turned out to be blind alleys. I want to balance the
confidence to seek and penetrate, to dare to speculate and create
systems of thought, with the recognition that it is likely that Hegel’s
concept of history as a dialectical process is probably right: Others
will point out antithetical ideas, and others will find ways to use the
best of my insights and charitably leave the worst.
On other
webpages, I’ll pursue some of these points.